- Joined
- Mar 17, 2024
- Messages
- 5,433
And also the mods have better arguments for not banning her that I listened to and agreed with
You are making a bit of this up I believe.So what? I don't see Oot, Albert, Hamas_2, XXX_SKIBIDISIGMA_XXX justify child marriages. It's common sense
They can have their religion, sure, but their religion doesn't protect them when they start advocating for child marriage. Not to mention that Christians aren't defending child marriage and not being banned so it doesn't matter what the bible says.Because the Bible has things like this as well. It's not a bannable offense to have a religion.
She was literally asked "It's okay to marry 9 year olds in islam and *you* approve of this?", and she said yes.You are making a bit of this up I believe.
Can someone post her appeal or what exactly she said again?
They can have their religion, sure, but their religion doesn't protect them when they start advocating for child marriage. Not to mention that Christians aren't defending child marriage and not being banned so it doesn't matter what the bible says.
View attachment 33122
also don't think that her religion changes the shit she said about "the age of mind" kek
She was literally asked "It's okay to marry 9 year olds in islam and *you* approve of this?", and she said yes.
lol simp mad@NekoRightsActivist go back to Chuds.life and KYS you depressed chink faggot
Worship Tyrone again and I'll finally be a simplol simp mad
I wouldn't know but @Oot has more to say on the matter, about how they were educational in the Qaran or some shit?Ermmm that's the point of marriages in religions doe. If you don't consummate then it isn't valid
>advocating for marrying 9 year olds is okay if you don't have sex with themMarriage doesn't inherently involve sex, think about all the underage marriages in the Bible belt.
If it doesn't involve sex than it isn't pedophilic, that's the only argument I'm making, not that I like it.>advocating for marrying 9 year olds is okay if you don't have sex with them
Is a weird argument to make, especially considering muhahamed had sex with Aisha when she was 9 anyway.
I don't really see what the point of making this argument is when muslims are both marrying and having sex with kids, and parkles defends this.If it doesn't involve sex than it isn't pedophilic
you like it enough to be making itnot that I like it.
Not the second part, she doesn'tmuslims are both marrying and having sex with kids, and parkles defends this.
I'm impartial, as I should be.you like it enough to be making it
Maybe we should have had a mutual understanding that deleting admin accounts that you don't like without the owner agreeing isn't ok.maybe you should've waited until froot banned someone worth arguing over, not some paki whore